Identity concealment games (2024)

Skip Abstract Section

1. Baier and Katoen, 2008 Baier C., Katoen J.-P., Principles of model checking, MIT Press, 2008.Google ScholarDigital Library
2. Başar and Olsder, 1998 Başar T., Olsder G.J., Dynamic noncooperative game theory, SIAM, 1998.Google Scholar
3. Boularias et al., 2011 Boularias,A., Kober,J., & Peters,J. (2011). Relative entropy inverse reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics (pp. 182–189).Google Scholar
4. Chatterjee et al., 2008 Chatterjee K., Henzinger T.A., Piterman N., Algorithms for Büchi games, 2008, arXiv preprint arXiv:0805.2620.Google Scholar
5. Chen et al., 2013 Chen T., Forejt V., Kwiatkowska M., Simaitis A., Wiltsche C., On stochastic games with multiple objectives, in: Proceedings of the 38th international symposium on mathematical foundations of computer science, Springer, 2013, pp. 266–277.Google Scholar
6. Cover and Thomas, 2012 Cover T.M., Thomas J.A., Elements of information theory, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.Google Scholar
7. Farajtabar et al., 2018 Farajtabar M., Chow Y., Ghavamzadeh M., More robust doubly robust off-policy evaluation, in: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on machine learning, PMLR, 2018, pp. 1447–1456.Google Scholar
8. Fiechter, 1994 Fiechter C.-N., Efficient reinforcement learning, in: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on computational learning theory, ACM, 1994, pp. 88–97.Google Scholar
9. Fox et al., 2016 Fox R., Pakman A., Tishby N., Taming the noise in reinforcement learning via soft updates, in: Proceedings of the 32nd conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, AUAI Press, 2016, pp. 202–211.Google Scholar
10. Grau-Moya et al., 2018 Grau-Moya J., Leibfried F., Bou-Ammar H., Balancing two-player stochastic games with soft Q-learning, in: Proceedings of the 27th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI Press, 2018, pp. 268–274.Google Scholar
11. Hecker, 2018 Hecker C., SpyParty, 2018, http://www.spyparty.com/. Online.Google Scholar
12. Hogg et al., 1977 Hogg R.V., Tanis E.A., Zimmerman D.L., Probability and statistical inference, vol. 993, Macmillan New York, 1977.Google Scholar
13. Karabag et al., 2021a Karabag M.O., Ornik M., Topcu U., Deception in supervisory control, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 67 (2) (2021) 738–753.Google Scholar
14. Karabag et al., 2021b Karabag M.O., Ornik M., Topcu U., Identity concealment games: how I learned to stop revealing and love the coincidences, 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.05377.Google Scholar
15. Karabag and Topcu, 2018 Karabag M.O., Topcu U., On the sample complexity of vanilla model-based offline reinforcement learning with dependent samples, in: Proceedings of the 37th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI Press, 2018, pp. 8195–8202.Google Scholar
16. Kardes and Hall, 2005 Kardes E., Hall R., Survey of literature on strategic decision making in the presence of adversaries, 2005.Google Scholar
17. Kearns and Singh, 2002 Kearns M., Singh S., Near-optimal reinforcement learning in polynomial time, Machine Learning 49 (2–3) (2002) 209–232.Google Scholar
18. Keren et al., 2016 Keren,S., Gal,A., & Karpas,E. (2016). Privacy Preserving Plans in Partially Observable Environments.. In Proceedings of the 25th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 3170–3176).Google Scholar
19. Kidambi et al., 2020 Kidambi R., Rajeswaran A., Netrapalli P., Joachims T., Morel: Model-based offline reinforcement learning, Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 21810–21823.Google Scholar
20. Kulkarni et al., 2019 Kulkarni,A., Srivastava,S., & Kambhampati,S. (2019). A unified framework for planning in adversarial and cooperative environments. In Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 2479–2487).Google Scholar
21. Levine et al., 2020 Levine S., Kumar A., Tucker G., Fu J., Offline reinforcement learning: Tutorial, review, and perspectives on open problems, 2020, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01643.Google Scholar
22. Macintyre, 2018 Macintyre B., The spy and the traitor: The greatest espionage story of the cold war, Viking, 2018.Google Scholar
23. Newman, 2015 Newman G., Garry’s Mod Guess Who, 2015, https://gmod.facepunch.com/. Online.Google Scholar
24. Patek and Bertsekas, 1999 Patek S.D., Bertsekas D.P., Stochastic shortest path games, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 37 (3) (1999) 804–824.Google Scholar
25. Peters et al., 2010 Peters,J., Mulling,K., & Altun,Y. (2010). Relative entropy policy search. In Proceedings of the 24th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.Google Scholar
26. Precup et al., 2000 Precup,D., Sutton,R. S., & Singh,S. P. (2000). Eligibility Traces for Off-Policy Policy Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on machine learning (pp. 759–766).Google Scholar
27. Puterman, 2014 Puterman M.L., Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming, John Wiley & Sons, 2014.Google Scholar
28. Ross and Bagnell, 2012 Ross S., Bagnell D., Agnostic system identification for model-based reinforcement learning, in: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on machine learning, PMLR, 2012, pp. 1905–1912.Google Scholar
29. Schulman et al., 2015 Schulman J., Levine S., Abbeel P., Jordan M., Moritz P., Trust region policy optimization, in: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on machine learning, PMLR, 2015, pp. 1889–1897.Google Scholar
30. Strehl et al., 2009 Strehl A.L., Li L., Littman M.L., Reinforcement learning in finite MDPs: PAC analysis, Journal of Machine Learning Research 10 (Nov) (2009) 2413–2444.Google Scholar
31. Strehl and Littman, 2008 Strehl A.L., Littman M.L., An analysis of model-based interval estimation for Markov decision processes, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 74 (8) (2008) 1309–1331.Google Scholar
32. Sutton and Barto, 2018 Sutton R.S., Barto A.G., Reinforcement learning: An introduction, MIT Press, 2018.Google ScholarDigital Library
33. Uehara and Sun, 2021 Uehara M., Sun W., Pessimistic model-based offline reinforcement learning under partial coverage, 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06226.Google Scholar
34. Weissman et al., 2003 Weissman T., Ordentlich E., Seroussi G., Verdu S., Weinberger M.J., Inequalities for the L1 deviation of the empirical distribution, Hewlett-Packard Labs, 2003.Google Scholar
35. Yu et al., 2020 Yu T., Thomas G., Yu L., Ermon S., Zou J.Y., Levine S., Finn C., Ma T., Mopo: Model-based offline policy optimization, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020) 14129–14142.Google Scholar

• Skill in Games

  Differences in players' skill are important determinants of relative player success in most real games such as poker, chess, basketball, business, and politics. Yet conventional game theory has concentrated primarily on games with no skill differences ...

  Read More

• Mastering multi-player games

  AAMAS '12: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2

  We consider multi-player games, and the guarantees that a master player that plays on behalf of a set of players can offer them, without making any assumptions on the rationality of the other players. Our model consists of an (n + 1)-player game, with m ...

  Read More

• Fuzzily Constrained Games

  WI-IAT '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) - Volume 02

  In real life, games are often played in contexts. So, when a player of a game chooses a strategy, it should consider not only the material or money payoff from taking the strategy and others' best response but also how feasible to take the strategy in ...

  Read More